<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 128 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67935</link>
    <description>Cash payments made in a running account to a sister concern were treated as outside the rigid application of section 40A(3) where the parties were identifiable, the transactions were found genuine, and the material on record supported the need for cash payment. The CBDT circular was read as preventing a harsh disallowance in circumstances covered by rule 6DD(j), and the explanation for cash payment was accepted on the facts. The deletion of the addition under section 40A(3) was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:34:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 128 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67935</link>
      <description>Cash payments made in a running account to a sister concern were treated as outside the rigid application of section 40A(3) where the parties were identifiable, the transactions were found genuine, and the material on record supported the need for cash payment. The CBDT circular was read as preventing a harsh disallowance in circumstances covered by rule 6DD(j), and the explanation for cash payment was accepted on the facts. The deletion of the addition under section 40A(3) was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>