Stock-in-trade exclusion under wealth tax bars inclusion of builder's property, and related penalty falls with deleted addition.

A builder's property shown in the balance sheet as stock-in-trade was excluded from wealth-tax because section 2(ea) does not treat a house held as stock-in-trade as a taxable asset. Temporary letting pending sale did not alter the character of the property, so its value could not be taxed by applying gross maintainable rent. The corresponding penalty also could not survive once the quantum addition was deleted, as it had no independent basis.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee's building, held as stock-in-trade and shown in the balance sheet as such, could be included as an asset for wealth-tax purposes, and whether the penalty sustained by the Revenue could survive after deletion of the quantum addition.

Analysis: Wealth-tax under section 3 is attracted to net wealth, which is the aggregate value of assets as defined by the Act less allowable debts. Section 2(ea) specifically excludes any house for residential or commercial purposes which forms part of stock-in-trade. The assessee was a builder, the property in question was reflected as stock-in-trade, and the record showed that it was held for sale even though it was temporarily let out pending completion of the sale transaction. The character of the property, therefore, did not change merely because rent was received from the prospective purchaser. Once the property was treated as stock-in-trade, its value could not be brought to tax by applying gross maintainable rent. As the quantum addition itself did not survive, the penalty based on the same facts had no independent footing.

Conclusion: The property was not includible in the taxable assets of the assessee under the Wealth-tax Act, and the corresponding penalty also could not be sustained.

---