<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 366 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67191</link>
    <description>A builder&#039;s property shown in the balance sheet as stock-in-trade was excluded from wealth-tax because section 2(ea) does not treat a house held as stock-in-trade as a taxable asset. Temporary letting pending sale did not alter the character of the property, so its value could not be taxed by applying gross maintainable rent. The corresponding penalty also could not survive once the quantum addition was deleted, as it had no independent basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 366 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67191</link>
      <description>A builder&#039;s property shown in the balance sheet as stock-in-trade was excluded from wealth-tax because section 2(ea) does not treat a house held as stock-in-trade as a taxable asset. Temporary letting pending sale did not alter the character of the property, so its value could not be taxed by applying gross maintainable rent. The corresponding penalty also could not survive once the quantum addition was deleted, as it had no independent basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>