Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after an application under the settlement provisions had been admitted for being proceeded with, the income-tax authorities and the Commissioner (Appeals) retained jurisdiction to set aside the assessment orders and direct fresh assessments in conformity with the Settlement Commission's final order.
Analysis: On admission of the settlement application, the statutory scheme vested exclusive jurisdiction in the Settlement Commission and withdrew the powers of the income-tax authorities in relation to the case until the Commission passed its final order. The assessment orders could not thereafter be dealt with by the Commissioner (Appeals), and no provision authorised the appellate authority to set aside the assessments or require the Assessing Officer to pass fresh orders to give effect to the settlement proceedings. The settlement mechanism itself contemplated that the Commission would settle the matter and make the settlement effective, including dealing with the consequences of fraud or misrepresentation, without reviving appellate jurisdiction in the income-tax hierarchy.
Conclusion: The Commissioner (Appeals) had no jurisdiction to proceed with the appeals or to set aside the assessments, and the impugned order was unauthorised; the Revenue's appeals succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Once the Settlement Commission admits an application to be proceeded with, exclusive jurisdiction shifts to the Commission and the income-tax appellate authorities cease to have power to adjudicate or modify the assessment orders in the case.