Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid inputs such as HR sheets, angles, channels, joists and rounds used in the fabrication and erection of supporting structures for blast furnace and material handling equipment, notwithstanding that the structures were embedded to the earth.
Analysis: The inputs were used in the fabrication of supporting structures for industrial equipment and not for civil construction. The structures supported the blast furnace and raw material handling system and were treated as capital goods for the purpose of credit. Embedding the structures to the earth was held not to be a valid ground to deny credit. It was further held that Rule 57Q did not require the capital goods themselves to be dutiable for credit on parts used in their fabrication, and the cited decisions supported admissibility of credit on such supporting structures.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on the inputs used for the supporting structures, and denial of credit was unsustainable.