Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on inputs used in the manufacture of moulds which were intermediate products or capital goods used in the manufacture of glass bottles.
Analysis: Rule 57D(2) of the Central Excise Rules provided that credit of specified duty on inputs shall not be denied merely because intermediate products emerge during the manufacture of final products, or because such inputs are used in the manufacture of capital goods under Rule 57Q. The moulds were used in the course of manufacture of glass bottles and fell within the protective ambit of the rule. The fact that the moulds were treated as tools did not justify denial of credit where the statutory conditions for non-denial were satisfied.
Conclusion: Modvat credit could not be denied, and the denial was in law and unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit on inputs cannot be denied where the inputs are used in producing intermediate products or capital goods employed in the manufacture of the final product, by virtue of Rule 57D(2) of the Central Excise Rules.