Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on iron and steel items such as angles, channels, joints, beams and plates used in fabrication of support structures and parts or components of capital goods within the factory.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the goods were merely structural materials or whether, on their actual use in the factory, they formed part of capital goods or their components, spares and accessories. Applying the user test and the settled principle that goods used in fabrication of support structures for capital goods can qualify as capital goods where they are integrally connected with the functioning of the machinery, the factual findings recorded by the original authority were accepted. The reasoning was consistent with the line of authority recognising credit on structural steel items used for fabrication and erection of capital goods and support structures.
Conclusion: CENVAT credit on the disputed iron and steel items was admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Structural steel items used in the fabrication of support structures and integrated parts of capital goods are eligible for CENVAT credit when the user test shows that they function as components, spares or accessories of the capital goods.