Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the supporting steel structure and electrical items used in the manufacture of clinker and cement, and whether the penalty was sustainable.
Analysis: The supporting steel structure was found to perform the function of supporting the clinker hopper and related loading arrangement and was therefore treated as part of the plant. It was held to be eligible for capital goods credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The power pack voltage relay and choke cables were treated as electrical items and, on the basis of the applicable Larger Bench decision, were also held eligible for credit. Since the credit was admissible on the disputed items, there was no wrong availment to sustain the penalty.
Conclusion: The credit was held admissible and the penalty was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Items forming part of plant by reason of their function in the manufacturing arrangement, and electrical items qualifying as capital goods, are eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q, and penalty cannot be sustained where credit is correctly availed.