Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ducts and steel structurals used in the cement plant as part of the plant and machinery for manufacture of cement were eligible to be treated as capital goods for the purpose of Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The items were used in the manufacture process as integral components of the plant and machinery and not as mere independent steel structures. The Commissioner had correctly applied the ratio of the Supreme Court in Jawahar Mills and the view was supported by Tribunal decisions recognizing structural and support items, when functionally used in the manufacturing system, as eligible capital goods. The Revenue's objection that the items were classifiable under a nil-rated heading did not dislodge their functional nexus with the manufacturing plant.
Conclusion: The ducts and structurals were rightly held to be capital goods and Modvat credit was admissible.