Modvat credit on non-duty-paid inputs is unavailable; conditional exemptions require factual verification before deemed credit applies.

Deemed Modvat credit under the second proviso to Rule 57G(2) is confined to inputs on which duty was actually paid, with the provision relaxing only documentary proof. Inputs that are in fact non-duty paid, wholly exempt, or clearly recognizable as nil-rated do not qualify for deemed credit. In cases involving conditional exemption, entitlement depends on whether the exemption conditions were actually satisfied on the facts, so the Revenue must verify the position before allowing or denying credit. Credit also cannot be claimed on the basis that duty was paid on raw materials used to manufacture the input, because the relevant credit attaches only to duty paid on the input itself.

---

---

Issues: Whether deemed Modvat credit under the Government orders issued under the second proviso to Rule 57G(2) is available on inputs that are actually non-duty paid, wholly exempt from duty, or fall within conditional exemption notifications.

Analysis: The Modvat scheme proceeds on the basis that credit is available only on duty-paid inputs and the second proviso to Rule 57G(2) was intended to relax only the documentary requirement where duty had in fact been paid. The expression "clearly recognizable as being non-duty paid" covers inputs on which duty was not actually paid for any reason, including nil rate or total exemption. The words "charged to nil rate of duty" were construed broadly to include cases where no duty was actually collected, not merely goods shown in the tariff at nil rate. Where exemption is conditional, mere existence of an exemption notification is not enough; the Revenue must verify whether the conditions were actually satisfied before denying or allowing deemed credit. Credit cannot be claimed on the footing that duty was paid on the raw materials used to manufacture the input, because the relevant credit is only on duty paid on the input itself.

Conclusion: Deemed credit is not admissible where the input is actually non-duty paid, wholly exempt, or clearly recognizable as exempt or nil-rated; in conditional exemption cases, entitlement depends on verification of whether the exemption was actually available in the facts of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The deeming provision under Rule 57G(2) dispenses only with proof of duty payment by documents and does not extend Modvat credit to inputs on which duty was in fact not paid; conditional exemptions require factual verification before the input can be treated as exempt or non-duty paid.

---