Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed Modvat credit was admissible under Rule 57G(2) when the inputs were admittedly cleared at nil rate of duty.
Analysis: The benefit of deemed credit depended on the Government of India order issued under Rule 57G(2). The order relevant to the appeal was the one considered by the Larger Bench, and the Tribunal held that where the inputs had been cleared at nil rate of duty, the ratio of the Larger Bench decision denying deemed credit applied. The relied upon later order and letter did not govern the present claim, as they were either distinguishable on their terms or not issued under Rule 57G(2). Since the inputs were admittedly non-duty-paid by reason of nil rate clearance, the credit could not be extended.
Conclusion: Deemed Modvat credit was not admissible and the disallowance was upheld.