Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed Modvat credit under the Government of India order dated 01-03-1994 was admissible on M.S. ingots and mis-rolls, and whether credit could be denied on the ground that the inputs were clearly recognisable as non-duty paid.
Analysis: The relevant circular and earlier Government orders were noted to contain a stipulation denying credit where inputs were clearly recognisable as being non-duty paid. However, the Government of India order dated 01-03-1994 contained no such stipulation; it treated re-rollable material lying in stock on or after 01-04-1994 as deemed duty paid and eligible for credit. The earlier Larger Bench decision was distinguished because it dealt with earlier orders that expressly contained the non-duty-paid exception. On that basis, deemed credit was held admissible on M.S. ingots. Mis-rolls, however, were found to have been produced out of re-rollable material on which credit was already allowed, and credit on such mis-rolls was therefore not admissible.
Conclusion: Deemed Modvat credit was admissible on M.S. ingots, but not admissible on mis-rolls.
Final Conclusion: The denial of deemed Modvat credit was set aside for M.S. ingots and sustained for mis-rolls, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a later Government order granting deemed credit does not contain the earlier express exception for inputs clearly recognisable as non-duty paid, credit cannot be denied on that ground; but credit is not available again on products manufactured out of inputs on which such credit has already been allowed.