Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed credit under the Modvat scheme was admissible in respect of inputs which were covered by conditional exemption notifications and were not accompanied by duty-paying documents.
Analysis: The inputs were admittedly covered by conditional exemption notifications and the period in dispute was prior to the later amendment relied upon by the department. The Tribunal noted that earlier decisions of its coordinate benches had already held that conditional exemption does not by itself make the goods non-duty-paid, and that the department must establish by enquiry that the particular goods came from a non-duty-paid stream before denying deemed credit. The departmental reliance on a contrary Regional Bench order was found insufficient to displace the earlier consistent view, and the subsequent amendment to the Ministry's order was held inapplicable to the period in question.
Conclusion: Deemed credit was admissible, and the departmental objection failed.
Final Conclusion: The orders allowing deemed credit were sustained and the departmental appeals were rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs are covered by conditional exemption, non-duty-paid character cannot be presumed merely from the exemption; the burden lies on the department to prove that the goods were actually cleared without duty before denying deemed credit.