Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed MODVAT credit on steel sheets purchased from the open market was admissible when the department relied on an exemption notification to contend that the goods were clearly recognisable as non-duty paid.
Analysis: The credit scheme under Rule 57G(2) permitted deemed duty-paid treatment for specified inputs, except where the inputs were clearly recognisable as non-duty paid or charged to nil rate of duty. The exemption notification relied upon by the department did not establish unconditional exemption in all cases, because the exemption for M.S. sheets depended on satisfaction of specified conditions relating to duty-paid inputs and absence of prior credit. The department did not produce evidence showing that those conditions were satisfied in respect of the sheets purchased by the respondent from the market. Mere reliance on the exemption notification, without proof that the goods were in fact non-duty paid or nil-rated, was insufficient to displace the deemed credit claim.
Conclusion: The deemed credit was admissible and the department failed to justify its denial; the appeals were rejected.
Final Conclusion: The order under challenge was upheld, and the respondent retained the benefit of deemed credit on the disputed steel sheets.
Ratio Decidendi: Where deemed credit is permitted for specified inputs, the department must prove with evidence that the inputs fall within an exclusion such as being clearly recognisable as non-duty paid or nil-rated; a conditional exemption notification by itself does not discharge that burden.