Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether criminal proceedings against a company director could continue when the sole allegation of non-payment of VAT had been conclusively resolved in the director's favour under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
Analysis: The charge-sheet contained no allegation against the petitioner apart from non-payment of VAT as a director of the company. The reassessment creating the VAT demand, interest and penalty was set aside in fiscal appellate proceedings, which allowed the input-tax claim and directed deletion of the tax, interest and penalty. That determination had attained finality.
Conclusion: The criminal proceedings lacked any surviving basis against the petitioner and were quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Criminal proceedings cannot continue where their sole factual foundation is a fiscal liability that has been finally annulled in statutory appellate proceedings.