Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail in a case involving allegations of conspiracy, demand and acceptance of illegal gratification, and whether the material on record disclosed a case for release on bail.
Analysis: The record disclosed that a search was conducted by CGST officials, followed by allegations of demand of bribe, a trap operation, recovery of Rs. 70 lakhs, and a controlled WhatsApp conversation between the applicant and a co-accused in which the receipt of the amount and conversion into gold were discussed. The Court treated the conversation and surrounding circumstances as sufficient at the bail stage to connect the applicant with the alleged offence. The applicant's status as a woman, pregnancy, and the filing of charge-sheet were not found sufficient to outweigh the gravity of the and the incriminating material.
Conclusion: Bail was declined and the application was dismissed. The applicant was, however, afforded a direction for expeditious conclusion of the trial.