Composite goods classification: Galaxy Ring and sizing kit fall under Heading 9031 as measuring or checking apparatus.

The Samsung Galaxy Ring was treated as a composite good whose communication features were ancillary and whose core function was measuring and checking physiological data through sensors; it was therefore classified under Heading 9031 as measuring or checking apparatus, not as imitation jewellery, electro-diagnostic apparatus, or communication apparatus. The Sizing Kit, consisting of sample rings used only to determine finger size and fit, was also classified under Heading 9031 because its function was limited to measuring and checking size. The ruling further states that classification must follow the tariff terms, relevant section and chapter notes, and the General Rules for Interpretation, and that exemption notifications cannot determine tariff classification. Where no single essential character or principal function is decisive, the heading occurring last in numerical order applies.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the Samsung Galaxy Ring is classifiable as imitation jewellery, electro-diagnostic apparatus, or apparatus for transmission/reception of data, or as measuring or checking instruments under Heading 9031; and (ii) whether the Sizing Kit is classifiable under Heading 9031 as a measuring or checking instrument.

Issue (i): whether the Samsung Galaxy Ring is classifiable as imitation jewellery, electro-diagnostic apparatus, or apparatus for transmission/reception of data, or as measuring or checking instruments under Heading 9031.

Analysis: The tariff entry for imitation jewellery was held inapplicable because the product was not designed or marketed as an article of personal adornment, but as a health and fitness monitoring device. Heading 9018 was found inapplicable because the device is not used in professional medical practice for diagnosis, treatment, or surgical use, but for self-monitoring of physiological parameters. Heading 8517 was also rejected because its communication features were ancillary and not its intrinsic characteristic, and the device did not function as a communication apparatus in the sense contemplated by the tariff and explanatory notes. The device was found to be a composite good with multiple functions, none of which clearly imparted a single essential character; its core function was measuring and checking physiological data through sensors. In that setting, Heading 9031 was treated as the appropriate residual heading, and the device was held classifiable thereunder.

Conclusion: The Samsung Galaxy Ring is not classifiable under Headings 7117, 9018, or 8517, and is classifiable under Heading 9031, specifically CTH 90318000.

Issue (ii): whether the Sizing Kit is classifiable under Heading 9031 as a measuring or checking instrument.

Analysis: The Sizing Kit was found to consist of sample rings used only to determine the correct finger size and fit for the Galaxy Ring. Its purpose was limited to checking and measuring size, and it had no independent connection with the smart ring's communication or medical features. On that functional basis, it was treated as a measuring tool falling within Heading 9031.

Conclusion: The Sizing Kit is classifiable under Heading 9031, specifically CTH 90318000.

Final Conclusion: The advance ruling accepted classification of both imported products under Heading 9031, with the smart ring and the sizing kit treated as measuring or checking instruments rather than jewellery, medical apparatus, or communication apparatus.

Ratio Decidendi: For composite goods with multiple functions, classification depends on the tariff terms, relevant section and chapter notes, and the General Rules for Interpretation; where no single essential character or principal function is determinative, and competing headings equally merit consideration, the heading occurring last in numerical order applies. Exemption notifications cannot determine tariff classification.

---