Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Classification of augmented reality devices capable of multiple functions, and whether such goods fall under the residual heading or under the heading for optical/measuring and checking apparatus.
Analysis: The device was found to be a multifunctional product with several integrated components and no single principal function capable of being isolated with confidence. The classification exercise was therefore governed by the General Rules for Interpretation, particularly the rule that specific descriptions prevail, composite goods are classified by essential character where identifiable, and failing that, classification is made under the heading last in numerical order. The reasoning also took note that the device performed functions associated with measuring, checking, image generation and related operations, making heading 9031 a relevant tariff entry. Since the principal function could not be determined and the competing headings did not yield a more specific classification, recourse was taken to the last-heading rule.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under sub-heading 90318000.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a multifunctional composite device has no identifiable principal function, and competing headings do not provide a more specific classification, it is classified under the heading occurring last in numerical order under the General Rules for Interpretation.