Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether half-burnt coal ash or cinder generated in the use of coal in a boiler for electricity generation was liable to excise duty under the old tariff item No. 68.
Analysis: The demand was challenged on the ground that cinder was only a waste or by-product and did not amount to a manufactured excisable item. The dispute was confined to the old tariff regime. The Court noted that the point was covered by binding precedent holding that such cinder is not liable to excise duty under tariff item No. 68.
Conclusion: The levy of excise duty on cinder was held not sustainable and the petition was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A waste or by-product such as cinder arising from the use of coal in a boiler is not a manufactured excisable item and is not chargeable to duty under old tariff item No. 68.