<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 119 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46747</link>
    <description>Half-burnt coal ash or cinder generated in the use of coal in a boiler for electricity generation was treated as a waste or by-product, not a manufactured excisable item. Applying binding precedent under the old tariff regime, the HC held that such cinder was not chargeable to excise duty under tariff item No. 68. The levy was therefore not sustainable, and the petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 119 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46747</link>
      <description>Half-burnt coal ash or cinder generated in the use of coal in a boiler for electricity generation was treated as a waste or by-product, not a manufactured excisable item. Applying binding precedent under the old tariff regime, the HC held that such cinder was not chargeable to excise duty under tariff item No. 68. The levy was therefore not sustainable, and the petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>