Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sentence imposed upon conviction for customs offences warranted reduction having regard to the isolated nature of the attempt, the value of the contraband, and the confiscation already effected.
Analysis: The conviction was not interfered with. The only matter considered was the appropriate quantum of sentence. The order notes that the attempt was isolated and not shown to be part of an organised or habitual smuggling operation. It also notes that the goods had been confiscated and that the imprisonment of 2 years was excessive in the circumstances. The sentence was therefore re-assessed to meet the ends of justice.
Conclusion: The sentence of imprisonment was reduced from 2 years to 6 months and the fine was enhanced to Rs. 1 lakh, with default imprisonment of 2 months.