<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46596</link>
    <description>Conviction for customs offences was maintained, but the sentence was reconsidered on quantum alone. The court noted that the attempt appeared isolated, not part of an organised or habitual smuggling operation, and that the contraband had already been confiscated. In those circumstances, the original 2-year imprisonment was found excessive and was reduced to 6 months to meet the ends of justice. The fine was enhanced to Rs. 1 lakh, with default imprisonment of 2 months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46596</link>
      <description>Conviction for customs offences was maintained, but the sentence was reconsidered on quantum alone. The court noted that the attempt appeared isolated, not part of an organised or habitual smuggling operation, and that the contraband had already been confiscated. In those circumstances, the original 2-year imprisonment was found excessive and was reduced to 6 months to meet the ends of justice. The fine was enhanced to Rs. 1 lakh, with default imprisonment of 2 months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>