SEBI order affirmed, with limited clarification preserving individual transactions and monthly withdrawal rights.

The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the judgment affirming the SEBI order, finding no good ground to disturb the conclusions reached below. It nevertheless clarified, with the respondent's consent, that the restrictions and directions would not prevent the appellant from buying, selling, or otherwise entering into transactions in his individual capacity, and it allowed a monthly withdrawal for upkeep and maintenance. Any delay was condoned.

---

---

Issues: Whether interference was warranted with the impugned judgment affirming the SEBI order, and whether the appellant was entitled to limited clarifications concerning personal transactions and monthly withdrawal from bank accounts.

Analysis: Delay, if any, was condoned. The Court found no good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment confirming the order of the Whole Time Member, SEBI. At the same time, with consent of the respondent, it clarified that the restrictions and directions would not affect the appellant's ability to buy, sell, or enter into transactions in his individual capacity, and permitted a monthly withdrawal for upkeep and maintenance.

Conclusion: Interference was declined, while the clarificatory and ancillary reliefs regarding individual transactions and monthly withdrawal were granted.

---