TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Review dismissed; individual registrant misrepresented a partnership by offering advisory services in the firm's name, violating Regulation 6</h1> AT dismissed the review application, finding the registrant, who held registration in an individual capacity, had misrepresented that a partnership firm ... Review Application - Eligibility criteria as per Regulation 6 for registration - Investment advisory services - individual registered IA rendering services in the name of a partnership firm without separate firm registration - Tribunal found that - the appellant having obtained the registration in his individual capacity has misrepresented as if the firm, MTF Digi Sales was the registered entity - Registration obtained by Shri Neeraj Kumar in his individual capacity and the advice was being given in the name of the firm which is not permissible in law. HELD THAT:- We have heard the learned advocate for the applicant and find no error apparent on the face of the record to review the order dated 04.10.2024 of this Tribunal. There is, thus no merit in the application and the same stands dismissed. Appellate Tribunal (AT) considered an application seeking review of this Tribunal's order dated 04.10.2024 and, after hearing the parties, found 'no error apparent on the face of the record to review the order dated 04.10.2024 of this Tribunal. There is, thus no merit in the application and the same stands dismissed.' The application is therefore dismissed. Pending 'interlocutory application(s) stand disposed of. No costs.' Parties identified as applicant and Respondent-SEBI; the decision rests on the absence of palpable error warranting review, rather than re-adjudication of the underlying merits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
