Public interest challenge to a jewellery instalment scheme failed absent any statutory prohibition.

A petition challenging a jewellery instalment scheme was treated as lacking public interest because the arrangement was a commercial transaction between a trader and consumers. The Court found no identified statutory provision or regulatory rule prohibiting the scheme, and therefore declined to entertain the matter as public interest litigation. On that basis, the requested interdiction of the scheme was refused and the petition was dismissed as without substance.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petition disclosed any public interest and whether the impugned jewellery scheme could be interdicted in the absence of any identified statutory prohibition.

Analysis: The petition alleged that jewellery shop owners were conducting a scheme under which monthly instalments were collected for 11 months and ornaments were supplied at the end of the period. The Court found no element of public interest in the petition, observing that participation in such a scheme by consumers was, on the face of it, a commercial transaction between a businessman and a consumer. It was further noted that no statutory provision or rule was pointed out to show that such a scheme was prohibited.

Conclusion: The petition was held to be without substance and was dismissed.

Final Conclusion: The Court declined to entertain the petition as a public interest matter and refused to grant the requested direction against the scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: A petition alleging illegality in a commercial scheme cannot succeed as public interest litigation unless it identifies a statutory or regulatory prohibition governing the conduct complained of.

---