<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1599 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460117</link>
    <description>A petition challenging a jewellery instalment scheme was treated as lacking public interest because the arrangement was a commercial transaction between a trader and consumers. The Court found no identified statutory provision or regulatory rule prohibiting the scheme, and therefore declined to entertain the matter as public interest litigation. On that basis, the requested interdiction of the scheme was refused and the petition was dismissed as without substance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:42:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1599 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460117</link>
      <description>A petition challenging a jewellery instalment scheme was treated as lacking public interest because the arrangement was a commercial transaction between a trader and consumers. The Court found no identified statutory provision or regulatory rule prohibiting the scheme, and therefore declined to entertain the matter as public interest litigation. On that basis, the requested interdiction of the scheme was refused and the petition was dismissed as without substance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>