TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bail should be granted in a case involving recovery of commercial quantity of Codeine Phosphate in view of the restrictions under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Analysis: The materials on record prima facie showed recovery of 100 bottles of Phensedyl Syrup containing Codeine Phosphate in commercial quantity from the possession of the petitioners. In view of the statutory restrictions governing bail under the NDPS Act, the Court found no basis to extend the discretionary relief of bail.
Conclusion: Bail was refused.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
