<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1365 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458336</link>
    <description>Commercial quantity recovery of Codeine Phosphate triggered the bail restrictions under the NDPS Act. The materials on record prima facie showed recovery of 100 bottles of Phensedyl Syrup containing Codeine Phosphate from the petitioners&#039; possession, bringing the case within Section 37. In view of those statutory constraints, the Court found no basis to grant the discretionary relief of bail and refused bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1365 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458336</link>
      <description>Commercial quantity recovery of Codeine Phosphate triggered the bail restrictions under the NDPS Act. The materials on record prima facie showed recovery of 100 bottles of Phensedyl Syrup containing Codeine Phosphate from the petitioners&#039; possession, bringing the case within Section 37. In view of those statutory constraints, the Court found no basis to grant the discretionary relief of bail and refused bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>