TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, who had remained in custody for over five years and three months in connection with offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, was entitled to be released on bail.
Analysis: The petitioner's long incarceration was treated as a material circumstance warranting release on bail. The Court noted the prosecution's stand that the case was not confined to one penal provision but included more serious allegations as well. Even so, the length of custody was considered sufficient to justify enlargement on bail, leaving the merits of the accusations to be tried in the main proceedings.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner on furnishing the directed bail bond and sureties.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
