<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1277 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457276</link>
    <description>Long incarceration can justify enlargement on bail even where the prosecution alleges more serious offences beyond a single penal provision. The Supreme Court treated the petitioner&#039;s custody of over five years and three months as a material circumstance warranting release, and left the merits of the accusations to be examined in the main trial. Bail was therefore granted, subject to furnishing the directed bail bond and sureties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 18:03:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1277 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457276</link>
      <description>Long incarceration can justify enlargement on bail even where the prosecution alleges more serious offences beyond a single penal provision. The Supreme Court treated the petitioner&#039;s custody of over five years and three months as a material circumstance warranting release, and left the merits of the accusations to be examined in the main trial. Bail was therefore granted, subject to furnishing the directed bail bond and sureties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>