Legal Challenge Succeeds: Time-Barred Orders Overturned, Petitioner Granted Two-Week Window to File Delay Condonation Application HC allowed petitioner's challenge to three common orders initially rejected on limitation grounds. Despite dispute over exact date of order upload, court ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
HC allowed petitioner's challenge to three common orders initially rejected on limitation grounds. Despite dispute over exact date of order upload, court granted liberty to file condonation of delay application within two weeks. Appeals were restored without commenting on merits, providing procedural relief to petitioner.
Issues involved: Impugning orders in original solely on the ground of limitation, challenge of common order in three appeals, condonation of delay in filing appeals.
Impugning orders in original: The petitioner challenged three orders in original dated 28.07.2022, which were rejected on the ground of limitation. The petitioner filed one Writ Petition against an order in appeal passed in all three appeals. The petitioner sought to challenge all three orders in appeal as they were common, and additional court fees were directed to be filed for the two additional challenges.
Condonation of delay: The petitioner claimed to have become aware of the orders passed on 28.07.2022 only on 28.08.2022 when they were uploaded online. However, the respondent disputed this, stating that the orders were uploaded immediately on the same day they were passed. The petitioner argued that even if the date of uploading was considered as 28.08.2022, the appeals were within time. Requesting an opportunity to file an application seeking condonation of delay, the petitioner's plea was accepted. Consequently, all three orders in appeals were set aside, appeals restored, and liberty granted to file the condonation application within two weeks.
Disposition: The Court clarified that it did not comment on the merits of the contentions or the sufficiency of reasons for condonation of delay. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.