<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 271 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450490</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to three common orders initially rejected on limitation grounds. Despite dispute over exact date of order upload, court granted liberty to file condonation of delay application within two weeks. Appeals were restored without commenting on merits, providing procedural relief to petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 271 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450490</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to three common orders initially rejected on limitation grounds. Despite dispute over exact date of order upload, court granted liberty to file condonation of delay application within two weeks. Appeals were restored without commenting on merits, providing procedural relief to petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>