TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>GST Registration Revocation: Petitioner Granted Two Weeks to Submit Representation, Respondent Given Four Weeks to Review</h1> <h3>M/s Wahid Hussain Contractor GSTIN (05JSPH5470N2ZL) Versus Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate, Dehradun and Another</h3> HC directed petitioner to submit representation for GST registration revocation under Section 30 of CGST Act within two weeks. Respondent granted four ... Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to pay all the dues - HELD THAT:- The present Writ Petition (No. 3082 of 2023) is being decided with a direction that in case, petitioner moves his representation for revocation of the cancellation order, under Section 30 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 along with all the GST returns, outstanding tax and dues, if any, within two weeks’ from today, the Competent Authority shall consider the petitioner’s representation and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within four weeks’ thereafter. Issues involved: The issues involved in this case are the cancellation of GST registration and the petitioner's request for revocation of the cancellation order under Section 30 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.Cancellation of GST Registration:The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the quashing of the cancellation of GST Registration order dated 18.12.2021. The petitioner expressed readiness to pay all outstanding taxes, interest, and late fees. The petitioner's counsel referred to previous orders and requested a decision based on those orders. The respondent did not oppose the request and sought four weeks to decide on the petitioner's representation. The court, with the consent of both parties, directed that if the petitioner submits a representation for revocation of the cancellation order under Section 30 of the CGST Act, along with all necessary documents, within two weeks, the Competent Authority must consider the representation and make a decision within four weeks. The court clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.Revocation of Cancellation Order under Section 30:The petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner is prepared to fulfill all dues and mentioned that the matter aligns with previous orders. The counsel requested a decision based on those orders and informed that the petitioner would submit a representation to the Competent Authority within two weeks. The respondent did not oppose this request and asked for four weeks to review the representation. The court, with mutual agreement, directed that the petitioner must submit the representation for revocation of the cancellation order under Section 30 of the CGST Act, along with all relevant documents, within two weeks. The Competent Authority was instructed to consider the representation and issue an appropriate order within four weeks.
TaxTMI 
