<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 358 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445467</link>
    <description>HC directed petitioner to submit representation for GST registration revocation under Section 30 of CGST Act within two weeks. Respondent granted four weeks to review and decide on representation. Court did not express opinion on case merits but facilitated potential resolution through procedural guidance, allowing petitioner opportunity to address outstanding tax obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 358 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445467</link>
      <description>HC directed petitioner to submit representation for GST registration revocation under Section 30 of CGST Act within two weeks. Respondent granted four weeks to review and decide on representation. Court did not express opinion on case merits but facilitated potential resolution through procedural guidance, allowing petitioner opportunity to address outstanding tax obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>