TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. S.O. 1683(E) dated 24.05.2017 conferred jurisdiction on the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to decide the issues raised in the appeal, and whether the appellant was left remediless.
Analysis: The order records that, in view of the earlier decision in Spartek Ceramics India Ltd., the Tribunal had correctly held that the notification did not confer jurisdiction to decide the issues raised. It further observes that the earlier decision did not foreclose relief and that an aggrieved party could pursue a writ petition.
Conclusion: The notification was held not to confer jurisdiction on the Tribunal, and the availability of a writ petition was noticed as an alternate remedy.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed without any comment on the merits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
