https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443847 Notification No. S.O. 1683(E) dated 24.05.2017 was found not to confer jurisdiction on the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to decide the issues raised in the appeal, consistent with the earlier Spartek Ceramics India Ltd. decision. The Court also noted that the earlier ruling did not leave the appellant remediless, because an aggrieved party could pursue a writ petition as an alternate remedy. The appeal was dismissed without any comment on the merits. en-us Wed, 06 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Oct 2023 07:17:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443847 Notification No. S.O. 1683(E) dated 24.05.2017 was found not to confer jurisdiction on the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to decide the issues raised in the appeal, consistent with the earlier Spartek Ceramics India Ltd. decision. The Court also noted that the earlier ruling did not leave the appellant remediless, because an aggrieved party could pursue a writ petition as an alternate remedy. The appeal was dismissed without any comment on the merits. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 06 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443847