Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to release on bail under Section 436-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in the pending PMLA proceeding.
Analysis: The Directorate did not seek extension of custody after the initial remand. The appellant had already undergone incarceration for about 9 years and 2 months, including custody and sentence undergone for the predicate offences, and had remained in custody for more than half of the prescribed sentence after registration and arrest under the PMLA. On that basis, the statutory condition for invoking Section 436-A was satisfied.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to release on bail in the specified PMLA case, and the restriction limiting bail to six months was set aside.