https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443523 Section 436-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure was applied in a pending PMLA matter because custody had continued beyond half of the prescribed sentence, and the Directorate did not seek extension of custody after the initial remand. The appellant had spent about 9 years and 2 months in incarceration, including custody and sentence undergone for the predicate offences, which satisfied the statutory condition for release. Bail was accordingly granted in the PMLA case, and the restriction limiting bail to six months was set aside. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:17:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443523 Section 436-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure was applied in a pending PMLA matter because custody had continued beyond half of the prescribed sentence, and the Directorate did not seek extension of custody after the initial remand. The appellant had spent about 9 years and 2 months in incarceration, including custody and sentence undergone for the predicate offences, which satisfied the statutory condition for release. Bail was accordingly granted in the PMLA case, and the restriction limiting bail to six months was set aside. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443523