Tribunal directs deduction under section 80GGA, rejects disallowance under section 35AC.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under section 80GGA and recompute the assessee's income. The Tribunal found that the assessee had made the donation through valid channels and had submitted relevant documents, thus disallowing the disallowance of the donation made under section 35AC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal also held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 lacked tangible material and ruled in favor of the assessee on the merits without delving into the jurisdictional issue at that stage.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Disallowance of donation made by the assessee u/s 35AC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Summary of the judgment:

Issue 1: Reopening of assessment u/s 147
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the A.Y.2009-10, challenging the reopening of assessment u/s 147 of the Act. The reasons for reopening were related to a search action conducted on Navjeevan Charitable Trust, where it was found that expenses were mere book entries. The Assessing Officer rejected the submissions of the assessee, stating that the donations made were non-genuine. The assessee appealed to the Ld.CIT(A) who also upheld the disallowance. The assessee further appealed, arguing that the reopening reasons lacked tangible material. The Tribunal observed that the issue was covered in favor of the assessee on merits and did not delve into the jurisdictional issue at that stage.

Issue 2: Disallowance of donation u/s 35AC
The assessee made a donation to Navjeevan Charitable Trust, which was later found to be involved in providing accommodation entries. Despite the denial of the deduction by the Assessing Officer and Ld.CIT(A), the Tribunal found that the assessee had made the donation through valid channels and had submitted relevant documents. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee had discharged the burden of proof and the deduction could not be denied. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the ground raised by the assessee, partially allowing the appeal.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction u/s 80GGA and recompute the assessee's income.

---