Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a writ petition challenging notices issued for reassessment under the Income-tax Act was premature, and what procedure must be followed after issuance of notice under Section 148.
Analysis: On receipt of notice under Section 148, the proper course is for the assessee to file a return and, if so advised, seek the reasons recorded for reopening. The Assessing Officer must furnish those reasons within a reasonable time. After receiving the reasons, the assessee is entitled to file objections to the reopening, and the Assessing Officer is bound to dispose of the objections by passing a speaking order before proceeding further with the reassessment. In the facts before it, the Court found no justification to interfere with the order dismissing the writ petition.
Conclusion: The challenge to the reassessment notices did not warrant interference, and the writ petition was correctly treated as premature; the reassessment could proceed only after supply of reasons and disposal of objections by a speaking order.
Ratio Decidendi: When reassessment notice is issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, the assessee must first file a return, may seek recorded reasons, and is entitled to a speaking order on objections before reassessment proceedings continue.