Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, deletes Rs.8 lakhs as unexplained money under Income Tax Act

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs.8 lakhs as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The additional evidence provided by the father explaining the source of the funds was deemed admissible, leading to the deletion of the disputed amount.

---

---

Issues:
- Addition of Rs.8 lakhs as unexplained money u/s.69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
1. Admissibility of Additional Evidence:
- The appellant sought to submit additional evidence through an affidavit from the assessee's wife and father, explaining the source of Rs.8 lakhs deposited in the bank account.
- The Senior DR opposed the admissibility, arguing that the evidence should have been presented before the lower authorities.
- The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence, considering the explanation provided by the father regarding the source of the funds.

2. Assessment of Unexplained Money:
- The AO had made a total addition of Rs.26 lakhs as unexplained money deposited during the demonetization period.
- The CIT(A) accepted the explanation for Rs.18 lakhs received from the wife but questioned the source of Rs.8 lakhs from the father.
- The Tribunal noted that the father had withdrawn Rs.8 lakhs from his account and handed it over to the son, which was then deposited in the son's bank account.
- The Tribunal found the explanation reasonable and deleted the addition of Rs.8 lakhs, allowing the appeal of the assessee.

3. Final Decision:
- The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs.8 lakhs as unexplained money.
- The order was pronounced in the open court on 21st December 2022 in Chennai.

This judgment primarily dealt with the admissibility of additional evidence and the assessment of unexplained money under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence provided by the father, which clarified the source of the disputed amount. Ultimately, the Tribunal found the explanation reasonable and deleted the addition of Rs.8 lakhs, thereby allowing the appeal of the assessee.

---