<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 164 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs.8 lakhs as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The additional evidence provided by the father explaining the source of the funds was deemed admissible, leading to the deletion of the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:26:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 164 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs.8 lakhs as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The additional evidence provided by the father explaining the source of the funds was deemed admissible, leading to the deletion of the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>