Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to conditional relief against dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order and to restoration of the appeal on further deposit.
Analysis: The Tribunal had fixed the pre-deposit amount after considering the financial position of the petitioner. The petitioner had already paid part of the amount and sought further indulgence on the ground of inability to pay the balance within time. The Court balanced the requirement of compliance with the need to secure a hearing on merits by granting a further opportunity to deposit a reduced balance within a fixed time. It also directed that, upon such deposit, the appeal would be restored and the coercive steps for recovery would remain stayed.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted conditional relief. On depositing the further amount within time, the appeal was to be restored and decided on merits, and recovery proceedings were stayed meanwhile; failing such deposit, the respondents were free to proceed with recovery.