1991 (4) TMI 133

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....kes notice. 2. The Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore (third respondent) passed an order on 21-11-1989 holding that the petitioner had wrongly utilised the Notification No. 208/83 and after notice to the petitioner, he held that a sum of Rs. 2,99,502.94 is payable by him as duty and he also levied a penalty of Rs. 10,000/-. Against the said order, the petitioner has filed an appeal before ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the appeal restored. 3. Though this writ petition is not properly framed, I am not inclined to dismiss the same on technical grounds. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner could not pay the sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- as ordered by the Tribunal on or before 31-12-1990. The question now is, whether any relief can be given to the petitioner in respect of the payment of the pre-deposit....