Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (7) TMI 496 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT rules on land cost inclusion & construction cost computation under IT Act The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2006-07, focusing on the inclusion of land ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            ITAT rules on land cost inclusion & construction cost computation under IT Act

                            The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2006-07, focusing on the inclusion of land cost in deemed sale consideration and computation of construction cost. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the cost of land owned and relinquished should not be added to the deemed consideration. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the lower rate advocated by the assessee for the cost of construction based on the incomplete status of the building. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's cross objections, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.




                            Issues:
                            1. Reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2006-07.
                            2. Inclusion of cost of land in deemed sale consideration.
                            3. Computation of cost of construction for parting with land.
                            4. Dispute over the rate of construction cost.
                            5. Appeal by Revenue against CIT(A) order.
                            6. Cross Objections by the assessee.

                            Issue 1: Reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2006-07:
                            The case involved the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2006-07. The assessee received a residential house through a will and filed the return of income. The assessment was reopened, and after various proceedings, the Assessing Officer assessed the total income at a higher amount. The CIT(A) allowed the appeal, leading to the Revenue filing an appeal before the ITAT. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to re-examine the case, which led to further submissions and a remand report. Ultimately, the CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, leading to the Revenue appealing before the ITAT.

                            Issue 2: Inclusion of cost of land in deemed sale consideration:
                            The main dispute was regarding the inclusion of the cost of land relinquished by the assessee in the deemed sale consideration received. The Revenue argued for the inclusion of land cost, while the assessee contended that the cost of land already owned should not be added to the cost of construction. The ITAT held that the cost of land owned and relinquished by the assessee should not be included in the deemed consideration, as it was part of the sale-cum-development agreement.

                            Issue 3: Computation of cost of construction for parting with land:
                            Another point of contention was the computation of the cost of construction for parting with the land. The Revenue argued for a specific rate, while the assessee argued for a different rate based on the incomplete status of the building. The ITAT agreed with the assessee's argument, stating that the rate of construction should be based on the incomplete status of the building and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on this ground.

                            Issue 4: Dispute over the rate of construction cost:
                            There was a dispute over the rate of construction cost, with the Revenue advocating for a higher rate based on certain records. However, the ITAT considered the incomplete status of the building and upheld the lower rate decided by the CIT(A) for computing the cost of construction.

                            Issue 5: Appeal by Revenue against CIT(A) order:
                            The Revenue raised several grounds of appeal against the CIT(A) order, including errors in law and facts, disagreement on the treatment of land cost and construction rate, and the applicability of specific SRO rates. The ITAT carefully considered these grounds and made a decision based on the arguments presented by both parties.

                            Issue 6: Cross Objections by the assessee:
                            The assessee raised cross objections in support of their case, which were allowed in their favor. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's cross objections, thereby concluding the case in favor of the assessee.

                            This detailed analysis covers the various issues involved in the legal judgment delivered by the ITAT Visakhapatnam regarding the assessment for AY 2006-07 and the disputes related to the inclusion of land cost and computation of construction cost in the deemed sale consideration.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found