<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 496 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424941</link>
    <description>The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2006-07, focusing on the inclusion of land cost in deemed sale consideration and computation of construction cost. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the cost of land owned and relinquished should not be added to the deemed consideration. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the lower rate advocated by the assessee for the cost of construction based on the incomplete status of the building. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 496 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424941</link>
      <description>The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2006-07, focusing on the inclusion of land cost in deemed sale consideration and computation of construction cost. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the cost of land owned and relinquished should not be added to the deemed consideration. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the lower rate advocated by the assessee for the cost of construction based on the incomplete status of the building. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>