Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a petition alleging oppression and mismanagement, the Tribunal should appoint an independent administrator and suspend the board where the company had become non-functional because the requisite nominee directors had resigned and no valid board meeting could be held.
Analysis: The pleadings and the admitted factual position showed that the board could not function, no meeting could be validly convened, and the affairs of the company had come to a standstill. The shareholders' groups were in complete deadlock and each side blamed the other for the situation. In these circumstances, the Tribunal held that the continuance of the petitioners in management would not serve the company's interests and that an independent administrator was necessary to run the company till disposal of the company petition.
Conclusion: The prayer for appointment of an independent administrator was accepted and the board was suspended.
Final Conclusion: The company was placed under independent management pending further orders, with the Tribunal preserving the company's functioning during the pendency of the oppression and mismanagement proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a company is paralysed by shareholder deadlock and the board is unable to function, the Tribunal may, as an interim measure in oppression and mismanagement proceedings, appoint an independent administrator to manage the company's affairs and suspend the board.