<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 103 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424548</link>
    <description>In oppression and mismanagement proceedings, where shareholder deadlock leaves the company non-functional and no valid board meeting can be convened, the Tribunal may step in with interim protective relief. The admitted facts showed a complete standstill in the company&#039;s affairs, with nominee directors resigned and both shareholder groups blaming each other for the paralysis. On that basis, the Tribunal found that continuation of the existing management would not serve the company&#039;s interests and appointed an independent administrator to run the company pending disposal of the petition, while suspending the board to preserve business functioning during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2022 20:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 103 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424548</link>
      <description>In oppression and mismanagement proceedings, where shareholder deadlock leaves the company non-functional and no valid board meeting can be convened, the Tribunal may step in with interim protective relief. The admitted facts showed a complete standstill in the company&#039;s affairs, with nominee directors resigned and both shareholder groups blaming each other for the paralysis. On that basis, the Tribunal found that continuation of the existing management would not serve the company&#039;s interests and appointed an independent administrator to run the company pending disposal of the petition, while suspending the board to preserve business functioning during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>