Monthly license fees for residential property let to LIC for staff accommodation exempt from GST under Serial No. 12 of Notification 12/2017-CT(Rate)

Maharashtra AAR held that monthly license fees received for letting out residential property to LIC for staff accommodation are exempt from GST under Serial No. 12 of Notification No.12/2017-CT(Rate). The Authority ruled that exemption depends on property usage rather than recipient status. Since the residential building would be used for residential purposes by LIC staff, it qualifies for GST exemption. The ruling emphasized that GST applicability is determined by end use purpose, not property nature or recipient identity, following precedent from West Bengal AAR.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Whether the applicant is eligible for exemption from GST on the monthly license fee for letting out residential building to a commercial organization for staff use.

Analysis:
Issue 1: Interpretation of Notification No.12/2017-CT (Rate)
The applicant sought an advance ruling on the exemption from GST on the monthly license fee for letting out residential premises to a commercial entity for staff use. The applicant argued that the exemption under the notification is based on the nature and usage of the property, not the status of the recipient. The applicant highlighted the residential nature of the property and the specific restriction on commercial use in the agreement. The Authority agreed with the applicant, emphasizing that the exemption applies to the nature and usage of the property, not the recipient's status. The Authority also considered a letter from the commercial entity confirming the residential use by its staff members.

Issue 2: Jurisdictional Officer's Contention
The jurisdictional officer contended that the commercial organization's staff using the residential premises for work purposes constitutes commercial use, thus making the exemption inapplicable. However, the Authority found the officer's reasoning lacking, noting the absence of logical and legal arguments to support the claim. The officer's assertion that providing residential quarters to staff increases profits was not substantiated. The Authority rejected the officer's argument, emphasizing the distinction between commercial and residential use based on the purpose of the property.

Issue 3: Comparison with West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling
The Authority referenced a ruling by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling in a similar case involving leasing residential units to individuals and a commercial entity. The ruling emphasized that the exemption under the notification applies if the dwelling unit is used for residence, regardless of the recipient. The Authority applied the same reasoning to the present case, drawing parallels with the West Bengal ruling to support its decision.

Conclusion:
After detailed deliberations, the Authority concluded that the applicant is eligible for the exemption from GST on the monthly license fee for letting out residential premises to a commercial organization for staff use. The decision was based on the nature and usage of the property for residential purposes, as specified in the relevant notification. The ruling aligned with the interpretation of the notification's provisions and rejected the jurisdictional officer's arguments lacking logical and legal basis. The Authority's decision was supported by a reference to a similar ruling by another jurisdiction, reinforcing the applicability of the exemption in such cases.

---