Appeal partly allowed for income differences, interest expenses on loans disallowed except for bank interest.

The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify if income differences were offered in the subsequent year and to delete the addition if proven. The disallowance of interest expenses on interest-free loans was deleted, except for the confirmed bank interest amount of Rs. 1,49,916/-.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Difference between income reported in the return of income and in Form 26AS.
2. Disallowance of interest on interest-free loans and advances.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Difference between income reported in the return of income and in Form 26AS:

The first issue raised by the assessee pertains to the difference between the income reported in the return of income and the income reflected in Form 26AS. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed discrepancies amounting to Rs. 3,15,804/- between the income declared by the assessee and the income reported in Form 26AS. The AO added this amount to the total income of the assessee. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] partly upheld the AO's addition, emphasizing that the appellant had claimed Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on the amounts shown in Form 26AS, thus necessitating the inclusion of these amounts in the income for the relevant year.

The assessee contended that the differences arose because income pertaining to March 2010 was accounted for in the subsequent month, a practice consistently followed and previously accepted by the revenue. The tribunal acknowledged the assessee's mercantile system of accounting, which records revenue when earned and expenses when incurred. The tribunal noted that the authorities did not challenge the assessee's practice of recording income in the subsequent month. Therefore, it was implied that income recorded in April 2008 actually pertained to March 2008. The tribunal held that if the assessee could prove that the income difference was offered to tax in the subsequent year, no addition was warranted. However, the tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 1,49,916/- related to interest from the bank, as this was not challenged by the assessee.

2. Disallowance of interest on interest-free loans and advances:

The second issue concerns the disallowance of Rs. 10,77,000/- on account of interest on borrowed funds diverted for non-commercial purposes. The AO found that the assessee had incurred interest expenses on borrowed funds while advancing money without charging interest. The AO calculated the proportionate interest on such interest-free loans and added it to the total income. The CIT(A) partly upheld this disallowance, noting that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the interest-free loans were given out of interest-free funds. However, the CIT(A) allowed relief for an amount used to purchase a flat for housing staff.

The assessee argued that the interest-free loans were extended in earlier years, except for Rs. 6.25 lakhs, and no disallowance was made in those years. The tribunal agreed, citing the principle of consistency and definiteness of approach by the revenue, as established in the case of CIT Vs. Sridev Enterprises. The tribunal noted that sufficient interest-free funds were available with the assessee to justify the interest-free loans and advances. Therefore, no disallowance of interest expenses was warranted. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s finding and directed the AO to delete the addition.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It directed the AO to verify if the income differences were offered to tax in the subsequent year and to delete the addition if proven. The tribunal also directed the deletion of the disallowance of interest expenses related to interest-free loans and advances, except for the confirmed amount of Rs. 1,49,916/- related to bank interest. The order was pronounced on 28/02/2022 at Ahmedabad.

---